hudebnik: (Default)
... [personal profile] shalmestere and I stood up and made a bunch of promises in front of a church full of friends and family. We've lost some of those friends and family, but we've pretty much kept the promises. We're still together, still on speaking terms 99% of the time, still trying to understand one another and forgiving one another and loving one another.

Not Leaving The House is not how I'd expected to spend our 25th wedding anniversary, but you play the cards you're dealt.

Pictures to come, when I can find them. There's a nice one on my desk at the office, where I haven't been in four months....
hudebnik: (Default)
We've seen a lot of powerful men brought low in the past year by credible accusations of sexual harassment. (One presumes that far more lower-profile, less-powerful men have been doing the same thing, and have NOT been brought low because they're not celebrities. But that's not my topic right now.) Pretty much any such case is going to hinge on the difference between persuasion and coercion.

If I suggest to you that we go out for pizza, you had been thinking tacos, but after a few seconds' thought you say "Sure, pizza sounds good", that's persuasion.

If I suggest to you that we go out for pizza, you say "I'd prefer tacos," I add "There's a pizza joint all our friends have been raving about, right around the corner from where we're going to be anyway," and you say "Sure, pizza sounds good", that's still persuasion.

If I suggest to you that we go out for pizza, you say "I'd prefer tacos," and I then use physical force, emotional blackmail, threats to your job, or drugs to get you to the pizza place anyway, that's coercion.

Those are all clear cases, but somewhere on the fuzzy spectrum in between, things gradually morph from persuasion into coercion, and that's where things get messy.

There has to be a legitimate place for persuasion in a (budding or ongoing) romantic relationship, or nobody will ever make the first move; nothing will ever happen unless both parties are exactly equally enthusiastic at exactly the same time. At the same time, most people in my (socially liberal) circles would say there is no legitimate place for coercion in their romantic relationships.

To add another wrinkle, a "consensual" relationship between equals becomes something different if there's a large power difference between the parties. Monica Lewinsky and Bill Clinton, as far as we can tell, was a consensual affaire, but between the President of the United States and a twentysomething intern, what does "consent" mean?

Now, suppose one party to a relationship thinks they're near-equals, while the other perceives a large power difference: even if there's complete agreement about what objectively happened, one will see mild persuasion while the other sees coercion. Also, people in a privileged position (white, male, cis, het, U.S.-citizen, educated, rich) are generally less aware of that privilege than people in a less-privileged position. So even if actual relationships and sexual activities were completely random and uncorrelated with status (they're probably not), one would expect higher-status people to be accused of sexually harassing lower-status people, because the higher-status party honestly thought what they did was consensual, while the lower-status party just-as-honestly perceived it as coercive. The resulting situation is unpleasant for both the lower-status party (who feels coerced a lot of the time) and the higher-status party (who has to walk on eggshells and avoid asking for things, lest it be viewed as coercive).

Even between my wife and me (both white, educated, cis-het, U.S.-born), there is a power difference that neither of us caused, neither of us asked for, and neither of us can do anything about: I make much more money than she does, so if the marriage fell apart, I could walk away from it much more easily than she could. That fact had never occurred to me until she pointed it out a few years ago.

Xmas

Dec. 25th, 2007 12:31 pm
hudebnik: (Default)
Do you know how difficult it is to buy gift books for somebody who works in library collection development?

Just sayin'....
hudebnik: (Default)
I am thankful...


  • for walks in the park on a beautiful November day with [livejournal.com profile] shalmestere and the Things

  • <arlo>for a Thanksgiving dinner that couldn't be beat</arlo>, which we cooked together

  • that [livejournal.com profile] shalmestere and I, despite countless failures of communication, are still together and still trying to understand one another

  • that both [livejournal.com profile] shalmestere and I have jobs which

    • we believe in, i.e. the world is better with somebody doing this job than without;

    • pay a livable wage;

    • we're reasonably good at; and

    • we mostly enjoy.



  • that we can afford pretty much everything we need, and a fair number of things we want

  • that among all the centuries I might have been born into, I'm privileged to witness the Information Revolution (and therefore I have easy access to learn about the other centuries too, and email, and LJ, and programming languages, and...)

  • that although all four large mammals in the house have minor health issues, we have nothing serious

  • for friends and family, however eccentric

  • that I live in the US; as much as I kvetch about the way it's being run at the moment, there are many worse places I could be living

  • that I live within fifteen minutes' walk of groceries, non-blockbuster movies, doctor, dentist, vet, bike repair, library, barbers, post offices, banks, restaurants, drugstores, public transit that works, and a square mile of forest

  • (especially on Thanksgiving evening) for automatic dishwashers

hudebnik: (Default)
We did not go out of town. We did not go to an SCA demo. We did not get together with my cousin. Couple time.

Friday night we went to L'Ecole, our traditional celebratory-dinner spot (four-star cuisine for, let's say, three-star prices because the cooks are all students getting graded on their work). It was fabulous as always, despite the menu being slightly different from what [livejournal.com profile] shalmestere had read on the Web.

Saturday morning we went to the farmers' market (the one in Union Square, since the one a mile from our home hasn't opened yet for the season :-( ), chatted with farmers about their craft (sorta like chatting with SCA artisans about what they do with their hands) and bought some lovely fruits, vegetables, and meat. Dinner was grilled lamb steak, purple carrots, and sugar snap peas, followed by vanilla ice cream topped with really fresh raspberries (pureed with a bit of Grand Marnier). Yum! Somewhere in between, [livejournal.com profile] shalmestere finished sewing together the body of a fully-lined linen Gothic Fitted Dress; our nemesis, the sleeves, still lie ahead but the body looks really good.

After the traditional Sunday-morning low-carb pancakes, we went to the beach for the first time this year. The water was lovely, we started re-reading Order of the Phoenix and Half-Blood Prince respectively, and we'll probably both have sunburns tomorrow despite sunscreen and a beach umbrella. On the way home, we stopped at Circuit City and, as an anniversary present, bought a new clock radio that will talk to the iPod. (We'd been thinking of the Bose, but the iHome seems to do all the same things, with almost the same sound quality, for a fifth the price. Check back and see if that assessment changes over time....)

Tomorrow, back to work.

Profile

hudebnik: (Default)
hudebnik

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 67 8910
1112131415 1617
18192021222324
2526 27 28 293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 13th, 2025 08:53 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios