Pop culture
With "The Hunger Games" coming out in theaters this weekend,
shalmestere and I got a copy of the book and read it. It's a good read, with characters one cares about, and it looks as though it would lend itself reasonably well to movie treatment (handling the internal monologue with a combination of voice-over narration and flashbacks).
[VERY MINOR SPOILERS FOLLOW]
But I have to wonder: has author Suzanne Collins ever shot an arrow from a bow? Significant parts of the plot involve the protagonist's acquisition and use of a bow and arrows. I don't object to the shooting -- everything Katniss does in that realm could be done by a very good archer, which she is. There is no mention of ever stringing or un-stringing the bow, but that may not be a problem: I've never hunted with a bow, and I don't know how long it's practical to carry a strung bow before the constant tension starts damaging the bow. What bothered me was the references to putting down and picking up a "loaded bow". First, that's strange terminology... but more importantly, in my experience, if you put down a "loaded bow", the arrow falls off the string and it is no longer a "loaded bow". As
shalmestere points out, those passages might make sense if it were a cross bow, but a crossbow would be more complicated to build in the wilds (as Katniss's father has evidently done a number of times, and as it is suggested early on that Katniss might need to do).
The wilderness-survival parts are no "My Side of the Mountain", but (as a not-particularly-experienced wilderness-survival type myself) I didn't see any howlers.
Anyway, I think it'll probably be a decent movie.
Then last night, wandering around the satellite-dish menu at random, we decided on a lark to watch "The Big Bang Theory", which several people we know have raved about. I don't know: maybe this was a particularly bad episode, but neither of us felt any need to ever see it again.
[VERY MINOR SPOILERS FOLLOW]
But I have to wonder: has author Suzanne Collins ever shot an arrow from a bow? Significant parts of the plot involve the protagonist's acquisition and use of a bow and arrows. I don't object to the shooting -- everything Katniss does in that realm could be done by a very good archer, which she is. There is no mention of ever stringing or un-stringing the bow, but that may not be a problem: I've never hunted with a bow, and I don't know how long it's practical to carry a strung bow before the constant tension starts damaging the bow. What bothered me was the references to putting down and picking up a "loaded bow". First, that's strange terminology... but more importantly, in my experience, if you put down a "loaded bow", the arrow falls off the string and it is no longer a "loaded bow". As
The wilderness-survival parts are no "My Side of the Mountain", but (as a not-particularly-experienced wilderness-survival type myself) I didn't see any howlers.
Anyway, I think it'll probably be a decent movie.
Then last night, wandering around the satellite-dish menu at random, we decided on a lark to watch "The Big Bang Theory", which several people we know have raved about. I don't know: maybe this was a particularly bad episode, but neither of us felt any need to ever see it again.

no subject
no subject
Enough characters do enough flinch-worthy things often enough to keep me from really becoming a fan. I had the same problem warming up to "Frasier" (and "Cheers"), for similar reasons.
no subject
As for The Big Bang Theory, I haven't seen many episodes but one had a villain who was eerily close to my former husband. That alone made it worth watching :)
no subject
no subject
It was painful to watch--once was enough for me....
no subject
We had exactly the same reaction to TBBT.
no subject
no subject
I suppose a modern bow (perhaps compound) plus clip-on nocks could do that, but that doesn't sound like something one would hand-make without benefit of a shop.
I enjoy BBT most of the time, but they've produced some terrible episodes and it seems to me that the quality has declined significantly this season. It's gotten more juvenile, which I find disappointing.
no subject
Movie is a good movie. Without having read the books, it would be a pretty superficial experience, I think, since so much had to be left out. But they do a good job of leaving people who read them space to fill in the stuff they left out.
no subject
I think that the show has an audience among those who laugh with as much as those who laugh at the characters. I can't get good enough reception for that show now, but I would want to see it again just so I can remember sitting next to someone.
I can't speak to the quality of the writing or the decline thereof, since I have not been able to follow it consistently since the summer of 2010.
no subject
no subject
The movie is fast-paced and brutal, but very well done.
no subject
no subject